You need to have JavaScript enabled in order to access this site.

Pecha Kucha

Due No Due Date
Points 20
Submitting a text entry box, a media recording, or a file upload

Overview

A Pecha Kucha is a presentation form of 20 images for 20 seconds. Pecha Kucha (Japanese for “chit chat”) is a presentation style that involves the automatic movement of slides as the presenter is speaking. This format ensures that the speaker is concise, keeps the presentation moving, and gets through all of their content. The entire presentation lasts for exactly 6 minutes and 40 seconds.

How to complete the Assignment

This assignment is designed to be concise and streamlined. Your completed presentation will give a succinct look into your chosen topic.

A Pecha Kucha presentation can be recorded by using PowerPoint slides or other tools. Search the web for some Pecha Kucha examples or more information on how to do them.

For the purposes of the assignment you will create a Pecha Kucha on one of the following topics:

a favourite lesson done with students
a reflection of your practicum experience
a transformative educational experience from your own education journey

Samples

Below are some samples of Pecha Kucha slide shows.

Tools for Pecha Kucha

How to submit this assignment

When submitting, please include your name in your file. When ready, simply submit your file via the Submit Assignment button on the top right.

Rubric

Title:

Pecha Kucha Rubric

Pecha Kucha Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Edit criterion description Slide Show _5498 Range threshold: pts	Edit rating Delete rating 4 to >3.0 pts Exceeding The presentation has 20 slides timed to advance every 20 seconds. The presentation run flawlessly. blank Edit rating Delete rating 3 to >2.0 pts Proficient The presentation has 20 slides timed to advance every 20 seconds. The presentation runs with one minor technical flaw _3667 Edit rating Delete rating 2 to >1.0 pts Developing The presentation has 20 slides timed to advance every 20 seconds, but the presentation has several minor technical flaws. _617 Edit rating Delete rating 1 to >0 pts Emerging The presentation does not have 20 slides timed to advance every 20 seconds, OR the presentation has major technical flaws. blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 4 pts --
Edit criterion description Visual Appeal and Creativity _8098 Range threshold: pts	Edit rating Delete rating 4 to >4.0 pts Exceeding The presenter has high quality visual images and has used an exceptionally creative or intensely interesting visual design for the presentation. _640 Edit rating Delete rating 4 to >2.0 pts Proficient The presenter has used good quality visual images and has used a creative or very interesting visual design for the presentation _1260 Edit rating Delete rating 2 to >1.0 pts Developing The presenter has used adequate quality visual images, but does not use a creative or interesting visual design for the presentation. _1695 Edit rating Delete rating 1 to >0 pts Emerging Visual images are poorly chosen, OR the quality of the images is not legible, OR used a particularly garish or distracting visual design for the presentation _1407 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 4 pts --
Edit criterion description Prep & Presentation of Script _6923 Range threshold: pts	Edit rating Delete rating 4 to >3.0 pts Exceeding The presenter obviously prepared a compelling script, rehearsed, demonstrated superior knowledge of the subject matter, and did not read to audience. _8225 Edit rating Delete rating 3 to >2.0 pts Proficient The presenter obviously prepared a script, rehearsed, demonstrated strong knowledge of the subject matter, and did not read to audience. _9855 Edit rating Delete rating 2 to >1.0 pts Developing It appears the presenter prepared a mediocre script or was not adequately rehearsed, or demonstrated marginal knowledge of the subject matter, and occasionally read to the audience. _395 Edit rating Delete rating 1 to >0 pts Emerging It appears that the presenter did not prepare a script or did not rehearse, OR demonstrated minimal knowledge of the capstone (how weird), OR frequently read to audience. _3747 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 4 pts --
Edit criterion description Organization _9164 Range threshold: pts	Edit rating Delete rating 4 to >3.0 pts Exceeding The Pecha Kucha was extremely organized and the ideas and images flowed in a manner that was easily followed and understood. The material transitioned seamlessly from slide to slide. _608 Edit rating Delete rating 3 to >2.0 pts Proficient The Pecha Kucha was fairly organized and the ideas flowed well. There were perhaps jumps and transitions that were not entirely seamless. Easily understood. _6168 Edit rating Delete rating 2 to >1.0 pts Developing The Pecha Kucha was poorly organized and not easy to follow. Ideas and images were put together in a way that made comprehension difficult _9272 Edit rating Delete rating 1 to >0 pts Emerging The Pecha Kucha was unorganized and difficult to follow. Ideas and images were put together with little thought to audience understanding _9333 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 4 pts --
Edit criterion description Interest, Quality of Concept _4478 Range threshold: pts	Edit rating Delete rating 4 to >3.0 pts Exceeding The presenter chose an exceptionally interesting or unique topic that was well-suited to the Pecha Kucha style. A wide variety of examples were used. Ideas were well organized and convincing _3140 Edit rating Delete rating 3 to >2.0 pts Proficient The presenter chose an interesting or unique topic that was well-suited to the Pecha Kucha style. A good variety of examples were used. Ideas were organized and convincing. _9630 Edit rating Delete rating 2 to >1.0 pts Developing The presenter chose an acceptable topic that was suited to the Pecha Kucha style. A moderate variety of examples were used. Ideas were not well organized or not particularly convincing. _3923 Edit rating Delete rating 1 to >0 pts Emerging The presenter chose a topic that was not suited to the Pecha Kucha style, OR a poor variety of examples were used, OR ideas were poorly organized and not convincing. _5711 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 4 pts --
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row Description of criterion Range threshold: 5 pts	Edit rating Delete rating 5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank Edit rating Delete rating 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --

Rubric

Title:

Title

Title
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row Description of criterion Range threshold: 5 pts	Edit rating Delete rating 5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank Edit rating Delete rating 0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2 This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.	pts / 5 pts --