POSE
Open Access Discussion
Skip To Content
Dashboard
  • Login
  • Dashboard
  • Calendar
  • Inbox
  • History
  • Help
Close
  • My Dashboard
  • POSE
  • Assignments
  • Open Access Discussion
  • Home
  • Assignments
  • Zoom
  • POSE WordPress Site
  • Media Gallery
  • My Media

Open Access Discussion

  • Due Jan 31, 2021 by 11:59p.m.
  • Points 1
  • Submitting a discussion post
This assignment is currently locked.

To complete this activity:

  • Write a post in the discussion forum. You may use your own website or blog to post a response and provide a link in the discussion forum. If you would like to share your thoughts publicly to encourage conversation, use the Twitter hashtag #POSEUBC.
  • Contribute to the conversation by responding or asking questions in the forum

Discussion Topic

In the forum, respond to the following:

In the article “Marxism and Open Access in the Humanities: Turning Academic Labor against Itself“, David Golumbia writes:

Open Access (OA) advocacy is the only perspective I know of from which it has been suggested that the laborer should sacrifice that interest (ownership rights) in the name of some putative “greater good,” a good that is too often alleged to be in the laborer’s own interest. This is especially true when we are told that it is not in the laborer’s own interest to be able to decide when and how she expresses those property interests in her work.

(Golumbia, 2016, P. 102)

Reflecting on what you have learned about OA, do you think OA potentially inhibits ownership of intellectual property (IP)? How does the framing of the “greater good” impact the conversation around OA and IP?

1612166340 01/31/2021 11:59pm
Please include a description
Additional Comments:
Rating max score to > pts
Please include a rating title

Rubric

Find Rubric
Please include a title
Find a Rubric
Title
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
Title
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank
0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 5 out of 5